Saturday, October 14, 2006

Stocks Climb Again - It is Umpa-Lumpa time

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) made an all time high on Friday (Oct 13) reaching 11,960.51. The bulls seem to be in total control for now. Several theories are floating around as to why the market is trading at new highs despite the slowing economy.


  • Increased liqudity in the market (an increase in M3 Money Supply i.e. institutional money funds, large time deposits)
  • Lower gas prices (crude oil falling from $78 a barrel in August to the current $59 level)
  • High short-interest on the NYSE (short squeeze)
  • Rally in large-cap stocks (several large caps are undervalued)
  • Increased consumer spending
  • The Federal Reserve will start to lower short-term interest rates

So, what happened to the Iraq war, the North Korean nuclear test, the Iran nuclear stand-off, the huge US current-account deficit, upward trending US interest rates, and last but not least the correction in the US real estate valuations?

Investors seem to be marching fife and drum, with nary a glance at the geopolitical and fiscal environment. Since August 2006 the DJIA has increased by 10.75%. (incredible)

I find it hard to believe that a reduction of $1 per gallon at the pump (although significant) over less than a couple of months has suddenly made the US consumer feel warm and fuzzy. The strength in the retail sector is really puzzling. Several of the specialty retailers are showing double-digit growth in same store sales and continue to make new 52-week highs. Look at the charts of the following companies:

  • American Eagle Outfitters (AEOS)
  • Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF)
  • Dicks Sporting Goods (DKS)
  • Nordstrom (JWN)
  • Guess (GES)

In my opinion these stocks are starting to look overvalued. American Eagle Outfitters (AEOS) was a great stock to own at the beginning of the year ($21) but with about a 120% gain in the stock price, I think the party might just be getting over and the stock is probably due for a pullback.

Some stocks such as

are just behaving like the .com stocks of 1999. Is this price appreciation driven by strong and sustainable fundamentals or, is it merely an year-end window dressing charade of the mutual fund managers? Whatever it be, I guess Wall Street will always have a reason.

So where do we go from here? The benchmark indices may continue to set new highs (although the Nasdaq might have to wait a few more years) running up to the mid-term elections in November. However, the market is certainly setting itself up for a scary time this Halloween season and the "Umpa Lumpa" might just show up to take away the spoilt investor.

On that note, I would consider investing in the following:

  • Buy at-the-money put options for May 2007 on AEOS, ANF, UARM

My rationale for these recommendations are:

  • These stocks are overvalued and over-extended;
  • Consumer spending may not hold up into next year (reality will set in when investors come to grips with the sharp correction in property values)
  • Money is no longer cheap (Fed has increased interest rates 17 times since 2004)
  • I don't think we will see $40/barrel oil in the near future

Disclosure: I own puts on American Eagle, Abercrombie & Fitch, Dicks Sporting Goods

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Suriman.

On LVS:

it's at 83 and some posters are calling for it to break 100.

When&What put will you place orders on.

On UARM, heres what the Motley fool bear had to say:



By Anders Bylund (TMF Zahrim)
November 9, 2006

Under Armour (Nasdaq: UARM) is one of the hottest stocks on the market, and David Gardner even saw the company fit for inclusion in the Rule Breakers stable of revolutionary businesses this summer. But I don't buy it. The question marks are too big and too numerous, and I think you'll agree once I lay them out for you. Sorry, Tim, but there are some serious cracks in this armor.

Sizing up the competition
Under Armour's greatest competitive advantage is supposed to be its line of performance athletic clothing, which sucks moisture away from the athlete's skin to enhance performance in hot weather. The company started that market, but everyone from Adidas and its Reebok division to Nike (NYSE: NKE) and even Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A)(NYSE: BRK-B) subsidiary Russell have developed their own versions of the same thing. The first-mover advantage is old-hat now, and the much bigger research and marketing resources of the competition is sure to put a serious squeeze on Under Armour's pride and joy.

Clearly recognizing the danger of such a narrow focus, the company is trying to diversify now into football cleats and other assorted knick-knacks -- places where Nike and company have already staked out their massive market claims. Brilliant. I mean, if Adidas felt compelled to buy Reebok -- and neither one is exactly an underground operation -- just to get decent shelf space at Foot Locker (NYSE: FL), how would a tiny upstart with no market leverage be able to make a dent?

Valuation nation
So that's the fierce competition, but it's hardly the whole story. Some stocks are priced for perfection. I'd say that Under Armor is priced way beyond that point. The stock trades today at 5.5 times trailing sales and a staggering 71 time trailing earnings. Future earnings, you say? OK, that drops the P/E ratio to just 54.

To put those numbers into some context, the price-to-sales ratios of Nike and Columbia Sportswear (Nasdaq: COLM) hover around 1.5, and their trailing P/Es are 18 and 17, respectively. Under Armour has some big shoes to fill if it wants to justify the current price level. Let's try a quick discounted cash flow valuation, just to see how far out of whack this valuation really is.

Cash flow? What cash flow?
Oh, that's right -- we can't. Under Armour is sporting negative trailing free cash flows. Yet it is valued on par with Columbia, where the revenues and earnings are about three times fatter. That's just not gonna fly here. You know what happens to these highfliers when they hit their first snag -- they plummet right down to Earth, where they belong. It happened to Hansen Natural this summer, and to Apple Computer (Nasdaq: AAPL) last spring, and it will happen to Under Armour. The only question is when, and with such a massive collection of sportswear giants looking to eat the company's lunch, I'd say it happens sooner rather than later. Then we might talk about buying in, but until that happens, count me out.


I am stuck in it now and can just hang on.

Anonymous said...

Another Thing ..

There was talk of with the Democrats comming into power in congress, they would hit Big Pharma.

I am watching PFE. It's getting on the cheaper side with a dividend that rivals 1 year term deposits

I am eying this for calls if it gets to low 20s as I missed my chance last time when others I know made some money

Anonymous said...

Aravind,

I would like to see your take on LVS next. I enjoy your Blog.

J